The art of medicine healing in the postmodern epoch

Posted on by adminLeave a comment

Prof. Semydotska Zh.D, assoc. prof. Chernyakova I.O, assoc. prof. Avdeyeva O.V.

Kharkiv National Medical University

Department of Propedeutics of Internal Medicine №2 and Nursing

 The article deals with the peculiarities of the development of the mankind, medicine, the art of healing in different periods (pre-industrial, industrial, post-industrial) of the pre-modern, modern, postmodern epochs. Particular attention is paid to the postmodern period the appearance of which is connected with the disturbance of a human to adapt to the extraordinary acceleration of the pace of scientific development as well as development of technology, biomedical technologies, the increase in the number of crises and catastrophes. The features of the postmodern period in which the mankind is are under consideration: dehumanization of society, culture, medicine; identity crisis of an individual, patient, doctor; transformation of medicine into a service sector; a gap between the achievements of the life sciences, modern biotechnologies and a disappearing art of healing. The problems of the post-COVID world, the nearest future of the mankind are discussed.

Key words: postmodern, human, society, culture, medicine, art of healing, post-COVID world.

https://doi.org/10.15407/internalmed2023.02.063

Download.PDF (ukr)

Cite:

  1. Семидоцька, Ж.Д. Мистецтво лікування в епоху постмодерну / Ж.Д. Семидоцька, І.О. Чернякова, О.В. Авдєєва // Східноєвропейський журнал внутрішньої та сімейної медицини. – 2023. – № 2. – С. 63-69. http://doi.org/10.15407/internalmed2023.02.063
  2. Semydotska ZhD, Chernyakova IO, Avdeyeva OV. [The art of medicine healing in the postmodern epoch]. Shidnoevr. z. vnutr. simejnoi med. 2023;2:63-69. Ukrainian. http://doi.org/10.15407/internalmed2023.02.063

 References:

  1. Berdjaev N. Smysl istorii. «Mysl’»; 1990. 176 р. Russian
  2. Kapica SP. Paradoksy rosta. Zakony razvitija chelovechestva. M.: Al’pina non fikshn; 2012. 204 р. Russian
  3. D’jakonov IM. Puti istorii. Ot drevnejshego cheloveka do nashih dnej. Izd. 2, ispr. M.: KomKniga; 2007. 384 р. Russian
  4. Nazaretjan AP. Civilizacionnye krizisy v kontekste Universal’noj istorii. Sinergetika — psihologija — prognozirovanie. Izd. 2, pererabotan. i dopoln. M.: Mir; 2004. 368 р. Russian
  5. Stjopin VS. Istorija i filosofija nauki. M.: Akademicheskij Proekt, Triksta; 2011. 423 р. Russian
  6. Markov AV. Jevoljucija cheloveka. V 2-h kn. Kn. 2. Obez’jany, nejrony i dusha. M.: «Astrel’»; 2016. 512 р. Russian
  7. Harari JuN. Sapiens. Kratkaja istorija chelovechestva. M.: Sindbad; 2016. 512 р. Russian
  8. Belobratov AV. Jepoha moderna: granicy i poimenovanija. Semioticheskie issledovanija. Semiotic studies. T.1 (11). Р 33–41. Russian. Available from: http:// doi / org/10.org/10. 18287//2782-2966-2021-1-1-33-41.
  9. Habermas Ju. Filosofskij diskurs o moderne: per. s nem. M.: Ves’ Mir; 2003. 416 р. Russian
  10. Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern condition: A Report on Knowledge / J.-F. Lyotard. — Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. P. 40–41.
  11. Anderson P. Istoki postmodernizma. M.: Territorija budushhego; 2011. 208 р. Russian
  12. Volkov VN. Postmodern i ego interpretacija: monografija. M.: Izdatel’skie reshenija; 2016. 606 р. Russian
  13. Gavrilova JuV. Sinkretizm kak faktor formirovanija i jevoljucii social’noj real’nosti. Gumanitarnyj vektor. 2015;2:29–30.
  14. Mikeshina L. Jeklektika i sinergizm. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2014;39(1):60–78. Russian
  15. Jarkovaja IV. Lichnost’ v jepohu postmodernizma. Mіzhnarodnі ta polіtichnі doslіdzhennja. 2019;32:275–287. Russian. Available from: http:dx.doi. org/10.18524/2304-1439.2019.32/173854.
  16. Gorbatenko V. Postmodern і transformacіja cіnnіsnoї osnovi ljuds’kogo buttja. Polіtichnij menedzhment. 2005;1:1–11. Ukraininan
  17. Cerpickaja OL, Manukovskij VA, Kovalevskaja NV. Novye tendencii vo vzaimootnoshenijah vracha i pacienta. Skoraja medicinskaja pomoshh’. 2016;17(1):4–8. Russian. DOI: http: // doi.org/ 10/24884/2072-6716-2016-17-1-4-8.
  18. Laun B. Uterjannoe iskusstvo vrachevanija. M.: Kron-Press; 1998. 374 р. Russian
  19. Abaev Ju. K. Vrachevanie: sluzhenie ili obsluzhivanie. Zdravoohranenie. — 2019;3:29–35. Russian
  20. Hatterer R. Jeklektizm: krizis identichnosti chelovekocentrirovannyh terapevtov. Karl Rodzhers i ego posledovateli: psihoterapija na poroge HH1 veka. M.: Kognito-centr; 2005:293–305. Russian
  21. Galas D, Hood L. Systems Biology and Emerging Technologies Will Catalyze the Transition from Reactive Medicine to Predictive, Personalized, Preventive and Participatory (P4) Medicine. Interdisciplinary Bio Central. 2009;1(2):1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4051/ibc.2009.2.0006
  22. Flores M, Glusman G, Brogaard K, Price N, Hood L. P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society. Personalized Medicine. 2013;10(6):565-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pme.13.57
  23. Tereshchenko AV. Metamodernizm — nove poniattia v suchasnii internet-kulturi. Piata mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Vidkryti evoliutsionuiuchi systemy» ( 19–21 travnia 2020 r.). V.O. Dubka, V.B. Kyselova, editors. K.: FOP Maslakov; 2020. Р 146–148. Ukrainian
  24. Hanzi F. The Listening Society. А Metamodern Guide to politics. Hanzi F. Metamodernа; 2017. 416 р.
  25. Hood L. Systems Biology and P4 Medicine: Past, Present, and Future. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal. 2013;4(2):e0012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/rmmj.10112
  26. Hood L, Balling R, Auffray C. Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches. Biotechnology Journal. 2012;7(8):992-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100306
  27. Pablo Vaccari A. Why Should We Become Posthuman? The Beneficence Argument Questioned. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 2019;44(2):192-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy041