{"id":2599,"date":"2021-08-04T12:42:55","date_gmt":"2021-08-04T10:42:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/?p=2599"},"modified":"2021-11-16T14:35:20","modified_gmt":"2021-11-16T12:35:20","slug":"%d0%ba%d0%bb%d1%96%d0%bd%d1%96%d1%87%d0%bd%d1%96-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%be%d1%8f%d0%b2%d0%b8-%d1%82%d0%b0-%d1%83%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%bb%d0%b0%d0%b4%d0%bd%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d1%83%d1%82%d0%b2%d0%be%d1%80","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/archives\/2599","title":{"rendered":"Clinical manifestations and complications of formations of medium and big dimensions in the womb and ovaries"},"content":{"rendered":"

Amiraslanova N.A. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Azerbaijan Medical University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology \u2116 2 <\/strong><\/p>\n

The data showed that all patients had complaints, mainly for 2-3 symptoms. 56 patients of the main group (70.0 \u00b1 5.1%) and 24 patients of the comparison group (80.0 \u00b1 7.3%) complained of menstrual irregularities. Dysmenorrhea was observed in 42 patients of the main group (52.5 \u00b1 5.6 %) and 12 patients in the comparison group (40.0 \u00b1 8.9%), polymenorrhea, respectively, in 9 (11.2 \u00b1 3.6%) and 5 (16.7 \u00b1 6.8%) women. As a result of menstrual dysfunction in 11 women (13.7 \u00b1 5.1%) of the main group, such a complication of the underlying disease as anemia of the I degree (blood hemoglobin level 110 \u2014 91g \/ l) was noted. Anemia grade II (blood hemoglobin level of 90 \u2014 71 g \/ l) was detected in 7 (8,8%) women of the main group. Patients in the comparison group showed anemia of I degree in 4 (13,3%) women and 2 women (6.7%) had anemia of II degree. Of all the patients examined, 49.1 \u00b1 4.8% (54 women) complained of pain in the lower abdomen, having a diverse nature (aching, nagging pains radiating to the lumbar region). Dysuric disorders were observed in only 14 women (12.7 \u00b1 3.2% of women).<\/p>\n

Key words:<\/strong> complications, clinical manifestations, uterine myoma, laparoscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic gynecological surgery<\/p>\n

https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.15407\/internalmed2021.02.049<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Download.PDF (rus)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cite:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u0410\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430\u0441\u043b\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u041d.\u0410. \u041a\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u044f\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u043e\u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0438\u0445 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043c\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u0438 \u044f\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0445 \/\/ \u0421\u0445\u0456\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0454\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b \u0432\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0440\u0456\u0448\u043d\u044c\u043e\u0457 \u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0456\u043c\u0435\u0439\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u043c\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0446\u0438\u043d\u0438. – 2021. – \u2116 2. – \u0421. 49-52. doi: 15407\/internalmed2021.02.049<\/li>\n
  2. Amiraslanova NA. Klinicheskie proyavleniya i oslozhneniya obrazovanij bol’shikh razmerov v matke i yaichnikakh. [Clinical manifestations and complications of formations of medium and big dimensions in the womb and ovaries]. Shidnoevr. z. vnutr. simejnoi med. 2021;2:49-52. Russian. doi: 10.15407\/internalmed2021.02.049<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Refrences:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Bogdanov RR, Starokon’ PM. Vybor sposoba operacii u pacientov, operirovannyh s primeneniem maloinvazivnyh tehnologij. Sbornik tezisov XV s”ezda Federacii anesteziologov i reanimatologov. Moskva; 2016. \u0420 482-483. Russian<\/li>\n
    2. Dubrovina SO. Sovremennye predstavlenija o spaechnom processe. Doktor.ru. 2016;3(120):34-38. Russian<\/li>\n
    3. Rybin MS, Tkachenko RA. Vozdejstvie TAR – bloka na hirurgicheskie stressovye reakcii posle abdominal’nyh gisterjektomij. Medicina neotlozhnyh sostojanij. 2016;4(75): 134-138. Russian. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22141\/2224-0586.4.75.2016.75834<\/li>\n
    4. Demirayak G. A different technique in gasless laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017;37(5):622-626. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/01443615.2017.1282444<\/li>\n
    5. Magalov I., Poluxova A., Aliyeva A. Laparoscopic approach for surgical correction of obstetric complications in postpartum \/ Abstracts of the 26th Annual Congress of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) 18th – 21st. 2017;:26-39. Turkey.<\/li>\n
    6. Seong S, Park H, Park C, Yoon B, Kim I. Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Salpingectomy for Surgical Treatment of Tubal Pregnancy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2009;16(6):S129. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.08.623<\/li>\n
    7. Uccella S, Casarin J, Marconi N, Cromi A, Morosi C, Gisone B, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (\u22651500 g): Feasibility and Outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016;23(6):922-927. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.05.002<\/li>\n
    8. Yoon A, Kim T, Park J, Lee Y, Choi C, Lee J, Bae D, Kim B. Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Myomectomy: Characteristics of the Appropriate Myoma. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2013;20(6):S149. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.08.506<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Amiraslanova N.A. Azerbaijan Medical University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology \u2116 2 The data showed that all patients had complaints, mainly for 2-3 symptoms. 56 patients of the main group (70.0 \u00b1 5.1%) and 24 patients of the comparison group (80.0 \u00b1 7.3%) complained of menstrual irregularities. Dysmenorrhea was observed in 42 patients of the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[59,60,56],"tags":[],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.12.2","language":"en","enabled_languages":["uk","en","ru"],"languages":{"uk":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"ru":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2599"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2599"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2599\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2933,"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2599\/revisions\/2933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.internalmed-journal.in.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}